Responses To Questions Raised By Parents At The April 22 Communications Meeting at SVS
April 22nd Attendees: John Walsh, Joanne Feeney, Rob Zebick, Eileen Williams, Kit Jaroka, and Tan Miller
The following questions and comments were raised at the April 22nd meeting. The list below also includes several additional questions raised by parents who could not attend the April 22 meeting, but who communicated their questions via phone or email.
Questions and Answers/Responses:
1. What will be the approach of SVA and MCJS towards parents who sign up for volunteer activities but then do not meet their volunteer obligations? Will SVS and MCJS take a tough stance and force parents who don’t show up for their volunteer assignments to pay the “opt out” charge?
· It is all about fairness to all involved in fund-raising, so it would be up to the principal or dean of students to contact parents after the Home and School has tried to collect what is due from the parents.
2. When are we going to know who the new Principal is?
· Announcement was made on Wednesday, April 28.
3. Are there teachers who are not currently SVS teachers who are being interviewed for the K-8 positions at SVA / MCJS? Or have only current SVS teachers been interviewed so far?
· Only current teachers at SVS have been interviewed as of 4/30/10
4. Can parents provide input to the decision-makers who are hiring the teachers? If yes, how?
· Michael St Pierre and Pat Deleu did receive input from a number of parents over the last few weeks. Interviews are now completed.
5. Will there be offers made to teachers by 4/30 for all full-time positions that SVA and MCJS expect to have in the fall of 2010. Or will there be some SVA or MCJS full-time positions as of 4/30 for which an offer will not have been made as of 4/30?
· Offers have been made for over 90% of all full-time positions at SVA and MCJS for the fall of 2010. New teachers will be interviewed in May for any remaining openings.
6. What will the required uniforms be for boys and girls? And related to this question : Why can’t we keep uniform requirements the same indefinitely so that older SVS children can give “hand me downs” to their younger siblings – and save money for the parents?
· The new principal and dean of students will make the final decisions regarding uniforms for MCJS and SVA respectively. They have been informed of this question (i.e., question 7) so that they can take this input into consideration.
7. There are supposedly one or more “trust funds” that support SVS. What trust funds are there, and are they all being used as intended to support the SVS School?
· There is one trust fund for St Virgil School and this was created a number of years ago by Father Fallon. All funds from this trust have been used exclusively for St Virgil School (i.e., these funds are not used to support the Parish). There is currently about $14,000 in this trust fund.
8. Will there be one integrated calendar “on paper” for the combined SVA and MCJS schools? (Note: to clarify, the parent who posed this question was hoping that although there will be 2 schools and 2 handbooks – for ease of keeping track of all dates – can there be just 1 published calendar with all dates for both schools. This would make it easier for parents to keep track of all dates in one calendar.)
· It is recognized that one calendar for both schools is a good idea that would make it easier to keep track of all activities in one source. Every effort will be made to have a single calendar if at all possible.
9. Because of the current budget concerns, will there be any subjects eliminated from the curriculum in 2010-2011? (Note: by subjects, the parent meant both academic and related such as art, gym, etc.)
· At this point no cuts in the current SVS curriculum are planned. A final decision will be made once the 2010/2011 school year budgets are finalized.
10. Which entities (i.e.., the parish, prep, svs, boy scouts, other?) currently have priority for obtaining facilities such as the gym – i.e., what is the “pecking order”?
· The schools (SVA and MCJS) have priority over all other organizations for obtaining facilities on the school campus such as the gym. However, we do have to recognize that other organizations that are part of the Morris Plains community also depend on using the school facilities. Thus, to the extent that we can be flexible in scheduling other organizations’ requests, and occasionally juggle the schools’ utilization of our facilities to facilitate other organizations’ requests, we will continue to do so.
11. In the 2010-2011 academic year, will these priorities for obtaining facilities such as the gym remain the same? Will MCJS have an equal or higher priority than SVA?
· SVA and MCJS will equal priority in using school facilities such as the gym.
12. Will any improvements be made concerning the safety of children in the aftercare program? The school currently has unrestricted access, and nobody answers the school phone after hours.”
· This issue has been pointed out to the new principal and dean of students, and they will put a high priority on addressing any and all concerns.
Non Transition Related Comment:
· Several comments were made at the close of the meeting that SVS (and in the future MCJS and SVA) should improve its capabilities to send information to parents electronically. There was a request that the administrative personnel responsible for this receive additional training on email lists, etc.
o The new principal and dean of students will address this issue.